Reform Donor Ben Delo's £350k Loan to Academic Faces Bullying Allegations
Ben Delo, Reform UK's major donor, loaned £350,000 to academic Nina Power, who was later found guilty of online bullying and conduct with antisemitic undertones...

Major Donor's Financial Support Amid Legal Controversy
Ben Delo, a prominent financial backer of Reform UK, extended a substantial £350,000 loan to Nina Power, a conservative academic, during her involvement in a contentious legal dispute. The judicial proceedings that followed revealed troubling patterns of conduct that would ultimately shape public perception of the donation and its recipient.
The case involving Ben Delo's loan to the academic became particularly significant when court findings documented instances of online bullying attributed to Power. These discoveries raised questions about the circumstances surrounding the financial arrangement and the backgrounds of those receiving substantial support from Reform UK's wealthy benefactors.
The Defamation Case and Counter-Claims
Nina Power and her associate Daniel DC Miller initiated legal proceedings against performance artist Luke Turner, alleging that he had falsely accused them of antisemitism. This defamation action represented their attempt to challenge claims they perceived as damaging to their professional reputations and public standing.
However, Turner responded with his own counter-claim, asserting that Power and Miller had subjected him to harassment and intimidation. The mutual accusations created a complex legal situation where both parties presented themselves as victims of wrongdoing by the other side.
Judicial Findings on Conduct
The presiding judge delivered a comprehensive assessment of the evidence presented throughout the proceedings. The court's conclusion proved unfavorable to Power, with judicial findings indicating that her social media communications contained problematic elements that extended beyond simple disagreement or debate.
Specifically, the judge characterized Power's posts alongside those of her associate as bearing troubling characteristics. The judicial language used to describe these communications—suggesting
