Democrats Appointed 92% of Judges Blocking Trump Agenda: ‘Judicial Coup D’Etat’

In a recent statement, Republican Congressman Tom McClintock of California raised concerns about the high number of Democratic-appointed judges who have been blocking President Donald Trump’s first-term agenda. According to McClintock, a staggering 92 percent of these judges were appointed by Democrats, leading former House Speaker Newt Gingrich to label it as a “judicial coup d’état.”

This revelation has sparked a heated debate among politicians and legal experts, with many expressing their concerns about the role of the judiciary in the current political climate. Some argue that this high number of Democratic-appointed judges is evidence of a biased and partisan judiciary, while others believe that it is a natural consequence of the political landscape.

The issue of judicial appointments has always been a contentious one, with both Democrats and Republicans vying for control over the judiciary. With the power to interpret and uphold the law, judges hold a significant amount of influence in shaping the direction of the country. As such, it is crucial that these appointments are made based on merit and not political affiliation.

However, the statistics provided by Congressman McClintock raise questions about the impartiality of the judiciary. Out of the 792 federal judges currently serving, only 73 were appointed by President Trump, while the remaining 719 were appointed by previous administrations, the majority of which were Democrats. This stark imbalance has led to concerns about the ability of these judges to make fair and impartial decisions.

The issue of judicial activism has also been brought to the forefront with this revelation. Judicial activism refers to judges using their power to shape policy and make decisions based on their personal beliefs rather than strictly interpreting the law. With such a high number of Democratic-appointed judges, there are concerns that this could lead to a biased and politicized judiciary, rather than one that upholds the principles of justice and fairness.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has gone as far as calling this situation a “judicial coup d’état,” suggesting that the judiciary is working against the will of the people and attempting to undermine the democratically elected president. This sentiment is shared by many Republicans, who see these judges as obstructing the progress of the current administration.

On the other hand, Democrats argue that these judges are simply doing their job of upholding the Constitution and ensuring that the rule of law is maintained. They argue that the high number of Democratic-appointed judges is a result of the previous administration’s eight-year tenure and not a deliberate attempt to undermine the current president.

However, regardless of political affiliation, it is essential to remember that judges are meant to be impartial and independent, making decisions based on the law and not personal beliefs. The American people deserve a fair and unbiased judiciary that upholds the principles of justice and equality for all.

In light of these revelations, it is crucial for the current administration to prioritize judicial appointments and ensure that they are based on merit rather than political affiliation. It is also essential for the judiciary to remain independent and impartial, upholding the Constitution and the rule of law above all else.

In conclusion, the high number of Democratic-appointed judges blocking President Trump’s first-term agenda raises concerns about the impartiality and independence of the judiciary. The American people deserve a fair and unbiased judiciary, and it is the responsibility of both the executive and legislative branches to ensure that this is upheld. Only then can we truly have a government that works for the people and by the people.