Marlow: Trump-Hating ‘Fabulist’ Goldberg Did Not Have War Secrets

Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow has made a bold statement about The Atlantic’s Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg, calling him a “fabulist” and accusing him of pretending to have insider knowledge in the world of national security. In an interview on FNC’s “Sunday Morning Futures”, Marlow expressed his frustration with Goldberg’s actions and shed light on the truth behind his supposed “war secrets”.

Marlow’s scathing comments come in light of the recent controversy surrounding Goldberg’s article in The Atlantic, which alleged that President Donald Trump had made disparaging comments about military veterans. The article, titled “Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are ‘Losers’ and ‘Suckers'”, caused a stir among both the political and journalistic circles, with many questioning the credibility of the sources and the validity of the claims made.

In the interview, Marlow did not hold back in his criticism of Goldberg, stating that he is someone who “acted like he had war secrets” when he was added to a Signal chat among senior national security officials. Marlow further went on to claim that Goldberg had been “eating up” the attention and accolades that came with his explosive article, but failed to provide any substantial evidence to support his claims.

The Breitbart Editor-in-Chief also highlighted that Goldberg had a history of targeting Trump and his administration, making him an unreliable source for such a controversial story. He stated, “When you have someone who is this anti-Trump and pro-Democrat, who is known for lying and known for making up stories, I think it’s fair for us to say, ‘Hey, this guy is not a reliable source.'”

Marlow’s accusations against Goldberg are not unfounded. In fact, the Editor-in-Chief of The Atlantic has a history of publishing controversial articles, with a clear bias against the current administration. In 2018, Goldberg published an article claiming that Trump had referred to immigrants from Haiti and African countries as “shitholes”. However, multiple officials who were present at the meeting denied the claims, and no evidence was ever produced to support Goldberg’s article.

Jeffrey Goldberg is no stranger to controversy, and his latest article seems to be another attempt to push an anti-Trump agenda. Marlow’s statements shed light on the true intentions behind Goldberg’s article, and his accusation of being a “fabulist” holds weight considering his track record.

It is not surprising that Marlow’s comments have sparked a debate among media circles, with many questioning the credibility of The Atlantic’s reporting. Some have even come forward to defend Marlow’s stance, stating that Goldberg’s actions are not in line with ethical journalism practices.

In the world of journalism, trust and credibility are of utmost importance. It is the responsibility of journalists to present the facts and the truth to their readers, without any hidden agendas. However, in recent times, it seems that some journalists have chosen to push their personal biases and political agendas, rather than providing objective and accurate reporting.

The Atlantic’s Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg’s actions have not only damaged his own credibility, but also brought into question the credibility of journalism as a whole. It is time for journalists to take a step back and re-evaluate their responsibilities towards their readers and the integrity of their profession.

In conclusion, Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow’s comments about The Atlantic’s Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg shed light on the truth behind his recent controversial article. Marlow’s accusation of Goldberg being a “fabulist” is a wake-up call for journalists to prioritize the truth and ethical reporting over pushing personal biases and agendas. It is high time for journalists to regain the trust and credibility of their readers, and to uphold the principles of journalism with utmost integrity.