‘Even Handguns Too’: The Trace Reporter Floats Australia-Like Gun Ban After Trans Allegedly Kills Catholic School Children

In the wake of the tragic shooting in Minneapolis, the issue of gun control has once again come to the forefront of public discourse. And during a recent discussion on MSNBC, The Trace reporter Mike Spies made a bold suggestion that has sparked intense debate and controversy. He suggested that a ban on all handguns, similar to the one implemented in Australia, could potentially prevent future incidents of gun violence.

The very idea of banning handguns is a contentious one, with strong opinions on both sides of the argument. However, in light of the recent shooting at a Catholic school where innocent children lost their lives, Spies’ suggestion seems to hold weight and merit. With the frequency of gun violence increasing and innocent lives being lost, it is time to have a serious conversation about the effectiveness of current gun control measures.

Spies’ suggestion of a complete ban on handguns may seem extreme at first glance. But let us take a closer look at the situation in Australia, a country that successfully implemented a similar ban in 1996. Prior to the ban, Australia had seen a steep rise in mass shootings, with 13 incidents in the 18 years leading up to the ban. However, in the 22 years since the ban was implemented, there have been no mass shootings in the country. This is a clear indicator that stringent gun control measures, such as a ban on handguns, can have a significant impact on reducing gun violence.

Of course, there will be those who argue that a ban on handguns will not solve the issue of gun violence entirely. They may argue that criminals will find ways to obtain firearms illegally, rendering the ban ineffective. However, it is worth noting that in Australia, there has been a significant decrease in gun-related homicide rates since the ban was implemented. This suggests that a ban on handguns can act as a deterrent for criminals and make it harder for them to obtain firearms.

Moreover, it would be unfair to overlook the fact that Australia’s ban on handguns has had a positive impact on society as a whole. With fewer guns in circulation, there has been a decrease in accidental shootings and domestic violence incidents involving firearms. This is a crucial point to consider, as innocent lives are often lost in these types of incidents.

It is also essential to address the concerns of law-abiding citizens who own handguns for self-defense purposes. Spies’ suggestion may seem like a threat to their right to bear arms. However, it is worth noting that Australia’s ban on handguns did not include an outright confiscation of all firearms. Instead, it involved a strict licensing and registration system, ensuring that only responsible and law-abiding citizens could own firearms. This could be a viable solution for the United States as well, where the Second Amendment right to bear arms is highly valued.

It is understandable that the thought of a complete ban on handguns may be met with resistance from some members of society. But as responsible citizens, it is our duty to consider all possible solutions to address the issue of gun violence. We cannot afford to dismiss an idea that has worked effectively in another country and could potentially save countless lives in the future.

In conclusion, The Trace reporter Mike Spies’ suggestion of a ban on handguns may seem radical, but it is a conversation that needs to be had. It is time for our nation to take a long, hard look at our current gun control measures and consider implementing stricter measures, such as a ban on handguns. We owe it to the innocent lives lost to gun violence and their grieving families to do everything in our power to prevent future tragedies. As responsible citizens, let us come together and have a constructive dialogue on how we can make our communities safer by addressing the issue of gun violence.