DOJ Argues ‘Court Lacks the Jurisdiction’ After Judge Blocks Trump Use of Alien Enemies Act

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has responded to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg’s recent decision to block President Donald Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport suspected members of the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua (TdA). In a statement released on Monday, the DOJ argued that the court lacks the jurisdiction to interfere with the President’s use of this act.

The Alien Enemies Act, which was first enacted in 1798, allows the President to deport or detain any non-citizen who is deemed to be a threat to national security during times of war or national emergency. President Trump had invoked this act in an effort to deport members of TdA, a notorious gang known for their violent crimes and drug trafficking activities.

However, Judge Boasberg blocked the President’s use of this act, stating that it was not applicable in this case as there is no declared war or national emergency with Venezuela. The DOJ has now responded to this decision, arguing that the court does not have the authority to interfere with the President’s use of this act.

In their statement, the DOJ emphasized that the Alien Enemies Act is a vital tool in protecting the country from potential threats. They also pointed out that the President has the authority to determine who poses a threat to national security and to take necessary actions to protect the country.

The DOJ’s response has been met with mixed reactions. Some have praised the department for standing up for the President’s authority, while others have criticized the move, stating that it goes against the principles of checks and balances in the government.

However, it is important to note that the DOJ’s argument is not about the merits of the case or the actions of TdA. It is simply about the court’s jurisdiction to interfere with the President’s use of the Alien Enemies Act. This act has been used by previous administrations in similar situations, and the DOJ believes that it is within the President’s authority to use it in this case as well.

The decision to block the President’s use of the Alien Enemies Act has raised concerns about the safety of the American people. TdA is a dangerous gang that has been responsible for numerous violent crimes and drug trafficking activities. Allowing them to remain in the country poses a threat to the safety and security of American citizens.

The DOJ’s response to this decision is a clear indication of their commitment to protecting the country and its citizens. They are standing up for the President’s authority and ensuring that he has the necessary tools to keep the country safe.

It is also worth noting that the DOJ’s response is in line with the President’s tough stance on immigration and national security. President Trump has repeatedly emphasized the need to secure the borders and keep out those who pose a threat to the country. The DOJ’s argument in this case is a reflection of the President’s strong stance on these issues.

In conclusion, the Department of Justice’s response to the court’s decision to block the President’s use of the Alien Enemies Act is a clear indication of their commitment to protecting the country and its citizens. They have argued that the court lacks the jurisdiction to interfere with the President’s use of this act, and their stance is in line with the President’s tough stance on immigration and national security. The safety and security of the American people should always be a top priority, and the DOJ’s response is a step in the right direction.