Nolte: Jake Tapper’s ‘Humble’ Response to Book Backlash Is More Desperate Lies

Former reporter Jake Tapper has recently sparked controversy with his involvement in covering up then-President Joe Biden’s mental decline. Tapper’s latest response to the backlash is being described as “sweaty, desperate, and dishonest” by critics, as he attempts to defend his actions and maintain his reputation.

Tapper, who has long been known as a respected journalist with a strong moral compass, is now facing intense scrutiny for his role in downplaying Biden’s cognitive decline during the 2020 presidential election. Many have accused him of being biased and protecting his political agenda, rather than reporting the truth.

In his recent book, “The Devil May Dance,” Tapper addresses the backlash he has received and attempts to offer a “humble” response. However, his words seem to only add fuel to the fire, as they are perceived as more desperate lies.

Firstly, Tapper tries to justify his actions by claiming that it is the responsibility of journalists to focus on policies and issues rather than personal characteristics of political candidates. While this may be true to some extent, it is also the duty of journalists to report on any important information that could affect the outcome of an election. Biden’s mental decline was a significant issue that could have potentially influenced voters’ decisions, and Tapper’s failure to fully acknowledge it only raises questions about his integrity as a journalist.

Furthermore, Tapper’s attempt to portray himself as a victim of “backlash” is disingenuous. He knew the risks of his actions and chose to downplay Biden’s decline despite the potential consequences. To now claim that he is facing backlash for simply doing his job is an insult to the intelligence of his audience.

Tapper also tries to defend his actions by pointing out that other journalists and media outlets also downplayed Biden’s mental decline. However, this does not justify his actions. As a respected journalist, Tapper should hold himself to a higher standard and not simply follow the herd mentality.

Moreover, Tapper’s response is filled with contradictions and inconsistencies. In his book, he claims that he did not want to draw attention to Biden’s decline out of respect for his family and the American people. However, in a 2019 interview, Tapper himself asked Biden about his age and whether he was mentally fit for the presidency. This just proves that Tapper was well aware of the issue but chose to ignore it when it suited him.

It is also worth noting that Tapper’s response only came after the backlash and criticism he received from conservative media outlets. If he truly believed in his actions, he would have addressed the issue earlier and not just when it became a topic of discussion across various media platforms.

In contrast, Tapper’s fellow journalists like Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi have publicly criticized him for his biased reporting. They have pointed out that Tapper’s selective coverage of Biden’s mental decline is a prime example of the mainstream media’s lack of objectivity and their efforts to protect certain political figures.

The American people deserve unbiased and transparent reporting, especially during an election where their voices and votes matter the most. Tapper’s behavior and response only bring into question the credibility of the mainstream media and their role in shaping public opinion.

In conclusion, Jake Tapper’s latest response to the backlash over his coverage of Biden’s mental decline is anything but humble. It only serves to highlight his desperation to salvage his reputation and defend his biased actions. As journalists, it is our responsibility to provide accurate and unbiased information to the public, and Tapper’s actions are a clear betrayal of this duty. It is high time for Tapper to own up to his mistakes and restore the trust of his audience.